CCAT Score Requirements by Employer
Last updated: October 2026
Almost no employer publishes a CCAT cutoff. Criteria sets no pass mark, so each company picks its own threshold and most keep it internal. Every figure below is labeled by provenance: Published means the employer states it, Reported means candidate accounts converge on it, and Not published means no credible signal exists.
Why this page is different
Search for a CCAT score requirement and you will find confident tables listing exact numbers for dozens of companies. Very few of them cite anything. In practice the numbers come from three sources, and they are not equally trustworthy:
- Published — the employer says it in public. Rare, and usually vague ("each role has a target score").
- Reported — candidates who took the test describe where they landed relative to the cutoff. Useful in aggregate, unreliable in detail, and it drifts as hiring markets tighten.
- Not published — no signal at all. Any site showing a precise number here is extrapolating from another company's process.
We label every row rather than presenting all three as equivalent. Where a widely repeated number is actually folklore, we say so.
The anchor facts, straight from Criteria
Everything about score interpretation starts with the test itself, and this part is officially published:
| Fact | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Questions | 50, in 15 minutes | Criteria Corp |
| Penalty for wrong answers | None — guess every blank | Criteria Corp |
| Calculators | Not permitted | Criteria Corp |
| Average test taker | 24 correct out of 50 | Criteria Corp |
| Candidates who answer all 50 | Less than 1% | Criteria Corp |
| What employers receive | Raw score plus percentile | Criteria Corp |
| Standardization sample | 985 working adults, 18+ | Criteria Corp |
| Norm mean / median / SD | 24.2 / 24 / 8.58 | Criteria norms, widely reported |
Criteria's own guidance is blunt: you do not need to finish the test to impress an employer. The average is 24, and less than 1% of candidates answer all 50. Raw score alone tells an employer very little — the percentile is the number that gets compared against a threshold.
Raw score to percentile conversion
This is the table most sites skip, and it is the one that makes a cutoff number meaningful. Applying Criteria's published norm (mean 24.2, standard deviation 8.58) gives the approximate percentile for each raw score:
| Raw score (of 50) | Approx. percentile | Reads as |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 33rd | Below average |
| 24 | 50th | Exactly average |
| 26 | 59th | Slightly above average |
| 29 | 70th | Common PE-backed floor |
| 31 | 79th | Competitive for most roles |
| 33 | 85th | Strong; executive-tier floor |
| 35 | 90th | Top decile |
| 38 | 95th | Top 5% |
| 40 | 97th | Very rare |
| 44+ | 99th | Ceiling territory |
These are approximations, not an official conversion table. Criteria compares you against the norm group your employer selected, so exact placement can shift by a few percentile points. The shape holds, and it is close enough to plan against.
Requirements by employer
Provenance is in the last column. Read it before you read the number.
| Employer | Sector | Reported band | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossover | Remote tech staffing | Role-dependent target score | Published (no number) |
| Vista Equity portfolio (general roles) | Enterprise software | ~70th percentile (raw ~29) | Reported |
| Vista Equity portfolio (product, strategy) | Enterprise software | ~80th percentile (raw ~31) | Reported |
| Vista Equity portfolio (executive) | Enterprise software | ~85th percentile (raw ~33) | Reported |
| Finastra | Fintech | ~70th percentile | Reported |
| LogicMonitor | IT monitoring | ~70th–80th percentile | Reported |
| Vertafore | InsurTech | ~70th percentile | Reported |
| TIBCO / Cloud Software Group | Data & analytics | ~70th percentile | Reported |
| PowerSchool | EdTech | ~70th percentile | Reported |
| Cvent | Event software | ~65th–70th percentile | Reported |
| Apptio (IBM) | FinOps | ~65th percentile | Reported |
| CAI | IT services | 50th–60th percentile (raw ~28–32) | Reported |
| Shopify | E-commerce | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Jamf | Device management | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Datto (Kaseya) | Cybersecurity | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Pluralsight | EdTech | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Ping Identity | Identity security | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Wrike | Work management | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Gainsight | Customer success | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Marketo (Adobe) | Marketing automation | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Quick Base | Low-code | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Granicus | GovTech | No published cutoff | Not published |
| EAB | Education tech | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Mediaocean | Ad tech | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Solera | Automotive data | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Greenway Health | Health IT | No published cutoff | Not published |
| Drift | Conversational marketing | No published cutoff | Not published |
Notice the pattern: the more publicly a company talks about its hiring process, the vaguer its stated cutoff is. That is not an accident. Publishing a number invites gaming, so employers describe the shape of the bar and keep the number internal.
Crossover: the one company that addresses it directly
Crossover is worth calling out because it is the only major CCAT employer that discusses the score publicly at all. Its published selection process says the cognitive test is step two, that it is 15 minutes, and that "each role has a target score based on its level of responsibility." It also states that candidates who miss the target can retake after six months.
What Crossover does not publish is the number for any role. The figure of 40 that circulates widely is a candidate report, and it is repeated across the web as though it were official. Treat it as a directional signal about how competitive Crossover is, not as a threshold you can verify.
The practical takeaway is narrower than the folklore suggests: Crossover screens hard, retakes are possible but slow, and the score that matters is the one attached to the specific role you applied for.
What this means for your target
- Check your invitation first. If the email names the CCAT, the employer is screening with it. If it names Criteria, the same applies. The cutoff is theirs, not Criteria's.
- Convert your target to a raw score. A "70th percentile" floor means roughly 29 correct out of 50. That is a concrete, trainable number instead of a vague aspiration.
- Train against the clock, not the ceiling. Since less than 1% of candidates finish, the binding constraint for almost everyone is pacing, not ability. Bank easy questions early and guess without hesitation.
- Assume a high bar at PE-backed and remote-first employers. The reported floors cluster above the population average because those pipelines attract a self-selected, prepared candidate pool.
Find your actual raw score
Free timed test, 50 questions, no account required. Then compare your result against the percentile table above.
Start the free CCAT testFrequently asked questions
Does Crossover publish a CCAT score requirement?
Partially. Crossover states publicly that each role has a target score based on its level of responsibility and that a retake is available after six months. It does not publish the number for any role, so the widely repeated "40" is a candidate report rather than an official cutoff.
Is there an official CCAT passing score?
No. Criteria sets no pass mark. Employers receive your raw score and percentile and apply their own threshold, which is why two companies can screen the same score differently.
What is a 70th percentile CCAT score in raw points?
Roughly 29 correct out of 50, derived from Criteria's norm (mean 24.2, standard deviation 8.58). Exact placement shifts with the norm group your employer selected.
Why do different sites list different scores for the same company?
Because almost none of them cite a source. Employer cutoffs are rarely published, so most tables recycle candidate reports, sometimes after stripping the uncertainty language. This page keeps the provenance visible so you can weigh each figure yourself.
Do all Vista Equity portfolio companies share one cutoff?
No. Vista publishes no portfolio-wide threshold, and each portfolio company runs its own process. Reports cluster near a 70th percentile floor for general roles and higher for product, strategy, and executive positions, but no single number applies across the portfolio.
Related: which companies use the CCAT, the CCAT score guide, or the question bank breakdown. Preparing for a specific company? Start with the Crossover CCAT guide.